The Man Who Wouldn't Die (Until He Did)

On the night of 30th December 1916, Grigori Rasputin — the Siberian mystic who had become the most hated man in Russia through his influence over Tsar Nicholas II and Tsarina Alexandra — was lured to the Moika Palace in Petrograd by Prince Felix Yusupov.

Everyone “knows” what happened next. The cyanide‑laced cakes that had no effect. The poisoned wine he drank without flinching. The bullet to the chest that he survived. The beating that didn’t stop him. The second and third shots that still didn’t kill him. The body thrown into the frozen Neva River — where, according to legend, he was still alive, still clawing at the ice from underneath.

It is one of the most famous death stories ever told.

Almost none of it is true.

The Horror

The horror of Rasputin’s death is not that he couldn’t be killed. It is that the story was largely invented by the man who killed him — and the world believed it for a century.

Professor Dmitry Kosorotov performed the autopsy. His findings contradict Yusupov’s later account on nearly every key point.

No poison was found in Rasputin’s stomach. The cyanide cakes — the centrepiece of the legend — either contained no poison or the poison was never actually administered. One of the conspirators later admitted he had swapped the cyanide for a harmless powder at the last moment, unnerved by the idea of poisoning a guest.

No water was found in Rasputin’s lungs. He was not breathing when he entered the river. The unforgettable image of the holy man under the ice, hands bloodied from clawing at it, is physically impossible. He was already dead.

Three bullet wounds were recorded — one to the torso, one to the side, one to the forehead. The first two could match the handguns the conspirators carried. The third, the shot to the head, appears to have been fired at close range with a larger calibre than their weapons. Some modern ballistic analyses suggest it is consistent with a British .455 Webley revolver.

None of the known Russian plotters carried a Webley. A British intelligence officer named Oswald Rayner — Yusupov’s friend from Oxford days — did. He was in Petrograd at the time, attached to the British mission, and later hinted to colleagues that he had been involved. Britain had a clear strategic reason to want Rasputin removed: he was pushing for a separate peace with Germany that could have torn Russia out of the war and crippled the Allied position.

Put together, the evidence strongly suggests that the man who “couldn’t be killed” was in fact killed quite efficiently — with a single shot to the head from a British spy’s revolver. The poison, the miraculous survival, the drowning and the ice‑clawing were theatre layered on afterwards.

Yusupov wrote two memoirs about the murder: one in 1927, another in 1952. By then he was in exile, his vast fortune gone with the Revolution, living on dwindling assets in Paris. He needed income. The story of the unkillable mystic — the cakes, the bullets, the river — sold extraordinarily well. Each retelling became more dramatic. The legend paid his rent.

The Modern Relic

The Moika Palace in St Petersburg is now a museum. In the basement, a room has been staged as “Rasputin’s murder room” — velvet wallpaper, a small table laid with pastries and glasses of wine, wax figures of Rasputin and Yusupov under theatrical lighting.

The room is designed to match Yusupov’s version — the version the autopsy contradicts on almost every significant point. Tourists pay to see a reconstruction of a scene that probably never happened.

The likely real killing — a straightforward close‑range headshot, almost certainly with British involvement — has no wax figure, no pastry props, no river ice. It sits instead in autopsy notes, ballistic debates, and a few cryptic remarks from a minor intelligence officer whose name most visitors have never heard.

The legend of the unkillable mystic pays better than the truth. It always has.

← Back to the archive